Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen

I said the charges were dismissed and quoted everything. The condenscending use of quotes around "facts" is especially humorous given what I had quoted from R. v. Arkinstall, 2011 ABPC 23.

Take a look:
https://www.canlii.org/en/ab/abpc/do...011abpc23.html

The quote was from the aptly named Facts header. Where the Honourable T.C. Semenuk stated:
" Realizing the gravity of the situation, the Accused told Kaminsky he had enough, and that he was going to exit the vehicle. On opening the door, and raising his arms in submission, Kaminsky grabbed the Accused by the arms and threw him like a rag-doll, face first, on to the hood of the Tahoe. While pulling his arms forcefully behind his back to handcuff him, the Accused complained about a shoulder injury and that he was in pain. Kaminsky responded by striking the Accused forcefully with the baton twice on the back of his neck. This was witnessed by the civilian witness, Amestica, who had just arrived at the scene by taxi, after being phoned by Smitna, to bring the registration and insurance documents for the Tahoe. Amestica, who was standing on the sidewalk 10-15 feet away, shouted at Kaminsky that he should stop hitting his friend, and that he was going to kill him. Kaminsky responded, “#### off and go away or you will go to jail too”."

So it's just "facts" from a "judge" in a "trial" now?

Why try to discredit what I said, instead of taking a look at the issue. You're the reason these guys get away with it. Blue shield.