Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
It wasn’t even terrible.
The third goal was bad. Can’t go in, 19 times out of 20
The second - Passed to slot, goalie has to reset. Quick release. Goalie was screened. Perfectly placed inside the post. Why can’t people give Columbus credit for a good goal?
First - I thought the distraction of Gio and the guy in front wrestling for position contributed to a poorly controlled or placed rebound. Some people are sure he saw it. I don’t know how.
The timing of the third goal and the way it went in stunk.
But a giveaway made the shot possible.
Not horrible. Not great. Goals happen.
|
Not terrible but it was headed down the hill quickly. He played ok to start, but after having no clue on the first goal where it hit him and where the rebound may be, to just sit there, was a sign....and beaten clearly on the second, his confidence was suddenly in tatters to let in the third as he did.
As a poster mentioned, Peters probably talked to him and or saw the body language in the intermission and made the switch before the situation degerated further with his confidence, both for this game and the near future.