Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache
It wasn’t even terrible.
The third goal was bad. Can’t go in, 19 times out of 20
The second - Passed to slot, goalie has to reset. Quick release. Goalie was screened. Perfectly placed inside the post. Why can’t people give Columbus credit for a good goal?
First - I thought the distraction of Gio and the guy in front wrestling for position contributed to a poorly controlled or placed rebound. Some people are sure he saw it. I don’t know how.
The timing of the third goal and the way it went in stunk.
But a giveaway made the shot possible.
Not horrible. Not great. Goals happen.
|
First goal reminded me of the one that went through Smith against Montreal. In both cases the goalie was sure he had the puck and actually had zero idea it had gotten away.
The second was the most defensible. Sort of through a screen. Frankly, the goals against Smith were the best and least saveable chances of all the goals by both teams. Bob made all the same mistakes that Smith's been crucified for - 5 holes, deep in the net, over the shoulder, etc.