Quote:
Originally Posted by llwhiteoutll
This is a bit of an overreaction, especially since nothing beyond the HuffPo article headline says it was a trophy hunter. Even the link they provided in the article to try and claim that the department of fish and wildlife confirmed it, doesn't. All that it does is confirm that it was a legal harvest. There was nothing that detailed the hunter's motives or if there was wastage of the meat, aside from hysterical assumptions.
|
People don't eat wolves. They're one of the few species that generally have no requirement to use the meat. The only reason to shoot a wolf in a national park is for the skin or the mount. The other reason is predator control but that's not really applicable in parks.