But here's the thing .. it's not my top ten. Never suggested it was the best list or a better list than the standings.
It's a simple mathematical average of two averages; one for things they create, two for things they give up.
The whole point of the list was to provide what underlying numbers would say is the top teams in the league vs the teams that are there for how they've done in the standings. The idea is to have them different or what's the point? The differences are either telling of teams that have been somewhat fortunate, teams that have been somewhat unfortunate, or telling of nothing at all in some cases.
When I first posted this ... this is all I said ...
Quote:
|
Teams in the standings vs their underlying numbers ...
|