Quote:
Originally Posted by belsarius
I’m aware. I’m also aware that they are counted as an arms length government Corp and counted as a public job, not a private one. Their salaries, even though paid directly through levies, affect the aforementioned “10% public service pay premium” even though they are neither taxpayer funded or unionized.
So my question is, why is it ok to let someone with the same skills and experience make more because it is industry funded than if that same person worked for the government.
|
Wages should be set at the lowest possible rate that allows the position to be filled with a qualified person at an acceptable level of turnover.
What point are you trying to advance here?