Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
If we're going to continue using it, I would rather it has an injection of cash on hand to make it better - lest we get a full privately-funded facility, which is what people want but will never get.
|
That was sort of the problem the Yes side couldn't solve: How do you entice people to vote Yes when they are voting, in effect, for a Value Village Olympics? It seems strange to think spending more would have helped, but a lot of people rationalized it as "If you're going to spend all this, why not spend more to get what we want?". People are shallow of course, the flashy items would have driven more people to Yes than a fieldhouse or Winsport.