Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
Well, it was an investment from Calgary's end that would have seen lots more in return. We won't see that money otherwise. Now we're back to figuring out how we can take care of these facilities fully on our own again. I think these projects will eventually be funded by our taxes regardless, with less, or no, assistance.
|
You do realize that describing the Olympics as an 'investment' for Calgary infrastructure also entails the comparison of 'risk' that you would talk about for a typical investment, right?
Most of the 'no' side isn't against this idea. It's the idea that the risks involved would likely over run any benefit from investment. Or at least the levels of government and Bidco didn't dispel those fears with the information made public.