Quote:
Originally Posted by Roughneck
The Flames see any ticket tax/surcharge that takes away from their potential revenues as their contribution. They aren't going to accept anything that simply increases their contribution. That was the main sticking point of the deal that had 1/3 of the arena paid for by a ticket tax.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mephisto
So basically your asking the Flames to increase their contribution? That’s how they would characterize these ideas.
|
Yup and I think that is wrong and why it was rejected. I dont think other owners in other deals view a ticket tax as their share.