Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin
It's a little confusing though, Bingo. Your first sentence says you never state anything is an output, and that they're done with no manipulation, hypothesis or projection at all.
But then your next sentence says it's really simple, do more good things and less bad and you probably win more games than you lose. Assuming the "more good" and "less bad" is referring to your data than that is a hypothesis and/or projection, no?
And if so, I think that's what Squiggs and Res are taking issue with. It feels a little like you want them to mean more than they currently do, hence the frequent posts, but claim they aren't meant to say anything when you are challenged on them.
|
Well that was meant as a statement to see if he agreed.
I assumed most would ... guess I was wrong.
Did I present a causal relationship between underlying stats and winning?
If this is the run around posting this stats is going to create I may just take a pass. Not worth it. Honestly thought I was providing good information for the site that beats the hell out of reams of data in a table.