Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
Wrong. My position has always been and remains that there is practically no useful evidence either way. Any strong argument from the outside as to why Sigalet should be fired or retained are not especially convincing given the position that fans are in. My objections within this discussion have been with all STRONG POSITIONS on the matter. I have yet to see any strong endorsements for Sigalet’s job performance, so I suspect that my argument against the several strong detractions is being misconstrued as a vote of confidence.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
But as I already mentioned and has been mentioned in the past and will be mentioned in the future undoubtedly- is this is a fan based message board.
If you give no validation to any opinions here (unless they’re strictly positive of course!) then why come here? Why read opinion? Why bother!
None of us know, ever.
Anyone who ever criticized the Flames are always met with the same typecast (lazy actually) response.
. “Well you don’t really know you aren’t in the room”
“Well you don’t really know you’re not an expert”
“Well you don’t really know.. because X, Y, Z”
Ya. Exactly. That’s why this is a message board. I don’t claim to actually know. Nor does anyone else. I work a job have 3 kids and not a lot of time to build graphs spreadsheets and in depth analysis! But what I do have are experience watching millions of hours of hockey, playing the game, understanding the game (I think at least) and using my eyeballs.
Guess that’s all invalid UNLESS it’s strictly positive in opinion? And if that’s true why are you here? You don’t learn anything. You don’t challenge your belief system, what’s the point of all of this that you frequent so much?
You think it’s unfair to have strong opinions about a coach that literally has had next to no success in the position he coaches over the last several years?!? You think it’s offside to question that????? Seriously?