Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
So with this while We can’t include a new Arena in the bid Narrative the following things don’t make sense.
- McMahon is getting money - University owned primary tenant Pricate sports team
- Nakiska is getting money - Privately owned and operated for profit ski hill
- Saddledome is getting money - city owned Leased, Operated and maintained by private entity.
If the above 3 arrangements are acceptable to get Olympic Money why wouldn’t an Arena be?
|
It seems pretty clear to me that the angle is:
If Yes wins, the 6,000 person arena money goes to CSSC along with some sort of cherry on top which will come very close to being in the middle of what the 2 sides were proposing. We would then be able to use 2 full sized arenas for the games before shutting the saddledome down.
It's too much emotion to announce this right now + no point in announcing only for the no vote to win and then back to square 1.