View Single Post
Old 12-18-2006, 05:36 PM   #25
CaptainCrunch
Norm!
 
CaptainCrunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by I-Hate-Hulse View Post
To play Devil's Advocate: Would a larger fleet of newer model used F-16's be a better solution for Canada's immediate air defence needs? The cost between used F-16 (C/D variants, block 50/52) and JSF has to be huge, enough to possibly get some heavy lift Chinooks, or CAS helos.


Alternatively, what of going after brand new F-16 E/F variants? Could probably cover off Canada's needs, although it certianly lacks the sexy features of the F-35. Again, the cost savings could be worth it, preserving the role of one defence arm's abilities, while possibly expanding others.
While the F-16 is a superb fighter, its more limited in its air to ground role then both the F18 and the JSF's. The 16 is more classified as a light fighter/air superiority fighter, and is not a good primary fighter/bomber. Its also based on a 30 year old airframe is is reaching what is considered to be the end of life from a technology standpoint.

The JSF is more expensive but its justified by its strong multimission capability and its heavy payrole capability.
CaptainCrunch is offline   Reply With Quote