Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
You just need consent of one of the parties involved in the communication. If you're sitting less than a foot away from someone, you can easily make the case that your part of the conversation. The Senators would need to argue that it was a private conversation that was not intended to be heard by the Uber driver. That would not hold up.
Furthermore, even in a two-party jurisdiction, an obvious camera (assuming it wasn't tampered with to appear off when it was on) would possibly hold up.
|
Are there not reasonable expectations for the use of the camera, and of the resulting footage, for example for only purposes related to security?
This could potentially be a civil case where the usage of the information in a way it was not reasonably expected to be used could damage a livelihood, no?