View Single Post
Old 11-05-2018, 06:08 PM   #2259
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
We have governments and organizations willing to give us money to improve our infrastructure, totaling in the billions. Our local taxes will be going to a field house, Olympics or not, so we might as well do the project in a fashion that sees additional investment come in. This is direct investment in Calgary, in a time when our economy is lagging. It will help spur the design, construction, sport and tourism industries, among others, in our city on a large, large scale.

This funding will not be available outside the Olympics. These chances don't come along often, with this level of assistance. I believe it's our best chance to repair and rebuild our aging infrastructure, and it's why I will be voting 'yes'.
The Provincial and City will put in more money than dollars of infrastructure we get out of while taking on risk. This argument that we will spend just as much without the Olympics is absolutely false. We will not upgrade Nakiska, We will not put a dime into the saddledome we will not build this odd sized community arena, we will not upgrade the Big 4. These are dollars being wasted on projects that no one has on the books.

We are Not under any circumstances getting infrastructure in the billions of value no matter how you do the math. 1.4 billion (the most generous interpretation of the bid) is not billions (plural).
GGG is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: