People are also conflating what constitutes “going over budget”. When games have gone over, it’s primarily because they’ve added a whole bunch of new projects and counted them as Olympic costs - for example Vancouver adding a $2b transit line is not the type of thing you’re insuring against - it would, from my understaniding is, it would be more like the Field House, budgeted at $250m, costing $275m in the end. Or basic hosting costs going 10% over budgeted. In other words, adding an arena would not be having “$500m in cost overruns”. That would just be our choice using a venue we’re building aside from the games.
__________________
Trust the snake.
Last edited by Bunk; 11-04-2018 at 12:20 PM.
|