If it is forever then I am a "no" vote too. But I don't believe that it is.
Anytime there is a big and expensive proposal we have a large debate and lot's of "no" people trying to show how it is the end of the world. Yet, it never is.
When was the last time that an event like this "ruined" a city? And I don't mean that it gave the opposition party things to whine about. When did it actually hurt a city and their citizens long term?
What were the talking points of the opposition to the Vancouver games?
|