With some rounding errors, here's how I believe they are getting the per cent of every dollar going to charity, it has nothing to do with the reserve fund so the Flames having a higher reserve fund does not hurt them in this calculation. With some rounding errors:
Flames:
4.1M total revenue
-2.7M from the 50/50
-1.4M other
--0.3M from direct donations
--1.1M from the special events
1M for operating costs
So 1.4M (total, non 50/50) - 1M (operating cost)/ (1.4M) = 30%
MLSE
10.6 total revenue
-1.8 from the 50/50
-8.8M from other
--6.1M from donations and goods
--2.7 from special events
1.7M for operating costs
8.8M (total non 50/50) - 1.7M (operating costs)/ (8.8M) = 81%
Edmonton
7M total revenue
-3.5M from the 50/50
-3.5M from other
--1.7M from donations
--1.7M from special events
1.2M for operating costs
3.5M-1.2M/3.5M=65%
Winnipeg
6.9M total revenue
-1.5M from the 50/50
5.4M from other
--2.4M from donations and others
--3.0M from special events
1.7M for operating costs
5.4M-1.7M/5.4M= 69%
Senators
4.4M total revenue
1.1M from the 50/50
3.3M from others
1.8M for operating costs
3.3-1.8/3.3=46%
Similar calculations for Montreal and the Jays to get the 0.62 and 0.65 numbers. Canucks one was weird but I think it's because of the cash flow being negative.
So why are the Flames so ####ty? How come it costs them 1M to bring in 1.4M when everyone else spends between 1M-1.8M and brings in much more?
|