Quote:
Originally Posted by Flash Walken
They are the worst team in Canada for spreading that fund raising around.
Compared to their peers they are the worst charity at actually distributing the funds that they raise.
That should be a Paramount concern for anyone donating to that charity.
|
Are you even reading what is being written? They are the worst among their peers because they havent distributed the funds.
What you're seeing is a timing discrepancy. They could contribute all of that (I'm going assume $7M since $1M just went to the Children's Hospital but isnt encapsulated within this study) so of course their metrics look bad.
Their overhead is not outrageous so it stands to reason that at some point they're going to distribute those funds.
You're confusing the reality with the optics in conjunction with a flawed report.