Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Not really the area for an arena debate so I'll leave it.
But why does my assessment of the whole process being led by two idiots have to be unequal? And why does it have to agree with your weighting to not have it suggested someone was getting paid to produce a counter argument? (There's #6 or 7)
|
Because what those idiots are proposing is what actually matters.
Neither of them were killing it the personality department for sure, but the motives and impacts were drastically different.
Anyway. You're right, let the arena stay in the arena thread.