Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96
It's an example of you not accepting someone else's analysis as being at the same level as your analysis. Even in this response you say all I've done is copy and paste and I'm sadly mistaken. We've even got the full context from this thread and you've simply dismissed my analysis because it doesn't fit what you're looking for.
My point was that there are multiple examples of you talking down to others and dismissed their conclusions because they didn't do a deep dive like you did. Throughout the last year multiple people came to the conclusion GG needed to be fired for the Flames to be successful in the future. You ended up getting there but were dismissive of some people who didn't use your method or use advanced stats. When you used the example of looking in the house for your keys when they were in the garage, it was the same thing as the GG debate. Many of us didn't need to look around the house to know GG needed to be fired. We knew it was in the metaphorical garage.
I don't have a personal issue with you. I don't know you and I've never met you. In 9 years I've responded to about 12 of your posts. I have an opposing view from you on a couple of items. I have shown a number of examples that supports my view. You dismissed them as out of context and made a large leap to this being a personal issue. That's simply not true. I believe that you think your analysis is better than everyone's. That's my belief, and I have multiple reasons for thinking that. You saying that I'm taking things out of context isn't going to change my opinion. I'm okay to leave it at that.
|
Whatever floats your boat man.
Seemed like you were harbouring some pretty big feelings from 8 months ago to take the conversation where you did about my posting style.
If you're happy thinking that I run around thinking I'm superior to others, I'm pretty content to leave you in that thought process. Twenty one years of owning a website is bound to attract a few detractors.