Quote:
Originally Posted by AltaGuy
Eh? Questioning the process would extend to whatever led to Treliving’s belief that no additional interviews were required, and to land on Peters as the answer long before asking of other coaches what their answers would be to the question of “What would you do with this group?”
I really don’t get what you’re saying here... there should be no debate about not following a typical head coach hiring process?
|
That I agree that the GM is under fire for his coaching decision, regardless of process.
And that if you already know who you want to hire in a short window of time available you don't a) have time to do the normal process of interviewing many and b) likely don't need to go through that process at all if you have the man picked.
But just my opinion, you're welcome to focus on what you want.
If I'm handing the keys to a big asset to a manager I want conviction in decisions, not a long drawn out process to make sure he's not wrong.