View Single Post
Old 12-16-2006, 07:52 AM   #4
Devils'Advocate
#1 Goaltender
 
Devils'Advocate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Exp:
Default

I like what the judge did. She felt that, as a COURTROOM, there should be absolutely no perception of bias. Everyone that enters that courtroom should feel that there is complete and utter neutrality in all things. If there is *ANY* place that should not have anything that could be construed as religious it would be a courtroom. We've removed swearing on the Bible to tell the truth for the same reason.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

This is the umpteenth time this has come up this year. Everyone gets their panties in a knot over the "War on Christmas". I've said in every instance that it should be ALL or NOTHING. Particularly in the public domain. Queens Park (Ontario) has it correct: "Queen's Park, where there are Christmas trees aplenty this time of year, also celebrates Jewish, Muslim, Hindu and other traditions.". I also think the judge got it right. All or Nothing. Especially when we are dealing with taxpayer money.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Anyone else find humour in HOZ posting an article promoting the "wonderful privilege of building a pluralistic, multicultural society"?
Devils'Advocate is offline   Reply With Quote