Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Also, thats not an answer. Thats a deflection.
The statistics were wrong in every way that matters. So what good are they?
It seems 'silly' to me to give weight to statistics that are clearly erroneous.
|
A person walking away from a plane crash could say "the statistics around plane crashes were wrong in every way that matters because I didn't die. So what good are they?"
There's a whole lot of room between "clearly erroneous" and "100% infallible," which seems to be the standard that stats are being held to.