Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
I'm confused how it can be great it was boarderline illegal.
Also, still wasn't borderline anything.
I think it's dumb to think a hit was good and clean until it's found out later that an injury occured on the play, and that same hit is now bad for the game.
|
1) It was a reaction to the hit in real time.
2) some of the best hits are the borderline type, from both a entertainment and in-game impact perspective
3) I think being able to change one's opinion when presented with conflicted or alternative information is the opposite of dumb.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15
Just to circle back to this, I find it interesting that two mods thanked this post which is calling an assumption dumb.
First of all I didn't assume anything. I thought the point of this was Jiri wanted to discuss what hitting should/could be like if rules were changed. If you want real discussion perhaps don't call assumptions dumb and have mods thank that post.
|
you wrote, "We say, well if you take this hit out of the game you pretty much take all hitting out of the game."
That's a dumb thing to say.