It's basically all true, the Flames refused to comment on any of the claims. If the claims were false, the Flames would have commented, but seeing as the reporter who published the articles clearly had backup to her claims, going on the record as saying it's not true and then having her produce to goods would have been a debacle for them. Now to be fair, the Flames are not different than any other team in this situation, they wanted to spend as close to $0 on this as possible. But let's not act like their goal here is a fair deal, their goal is to rape the taxpayer as hard as possible. It's basically their fiduciary duty to do so, whether we like it or not.
__________________
"Think I'm gonna be the scapegoat for the whole damn machine? Sheeee......."
|