Quote:
Originally Posted by GioforPM
I get that argument. I just don't think it's true. It's unprovable either way, I guess. I think that if you have, say Jankowski in (and he plays at least as well as Peluso of course) this game ends up the same. For example, I don't believe that Gaudreau played differently because Peluso was in. Like I said, I can't prove that, but at the same time, the opposite can't be proven either.
|
Peluso may not have a huge effect on the game (I think he has a little) but if something stupid does happen with him in the lineup we don't lose our #4 defenseman with a broken jaw. If he is playing well, which he seemed to, then I think it's an overall benefit to have him in.