Quote:
Originally Posted by kman35ca
Ya some teams are fine without a fighter. But the majority of teams have at least one guy who can really throw down. Ideally it would be someone that can play hockey too.
I think Calgary's a unique situation. With all the talk about them seeming mentally weak. Would have loved to see someone like Simmonds on this team. Or If we were able to keep Engelland instead of Stone would have been ideal.
I know everyone wishes the goons of old were gone. But obviously they aren't. And until they are gone, we need to have guys that can answer the call. The league isn't going to protect them. You can't let a rookie take a dirty hit, and just ignore it. And say well we will score more goals. I still believe 100% you need to show your young players that they will have guys ready to answer the call if they face dirty hit's.
You don't want these young guys intimidated out there. And a good fight, especially if your guy wins, can swing the momentum your teams way...
|
I wouldn't say most want the goons and fighting gone. In fact, from my experience more people want to keep it in. Just cause a few on this site want to eliminate fighting(which isn't a right or wrong stance, its just an opinion everyone is entitled to), doesn't mean most feel that way. I have no issue with fighting in the league at all, its a part of the game. Its not going anywhere anytime soon.
In hockey, you can do both, score on the PP and also let the players know you will stand up for them.