View Single Post
Old 10-04-2018, 08:53 AM   #941
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Parallex View Post
Yes... but the high vacancy rate affects the assessed value no? So it's not that there isn't an owner to pay property tax but that the assessed value (and consequently the amount of tax gleaned from) is lower. If your building had an assessed value of say $10M but as a result of lower demand/over-supply the value drops to $6M... that's $4M dollars that the city won't be collecting tax on.
Not really - the market value is more used to determine how much of the pie the property has to pay. Let's say the total property taxes to be collected last year and this year is $2.00, $1.00 between two properties. If this property was $10M, and the other property was also $10M, and both have a new assessed value of $6M, both would still pay $1.00. The mill rate used, which is multiplied by the assessed value, would go up proportionally. If one property went to $5M, and the other went up to $15M, the first would pay $0.50, and the second $1.50.
calf is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to calf For This Useful Post: