[cannon7]

Originally Posted by Textcritic

Seriously, get over yourself. How is pointing out that I find parts of a stupid, and poorly executed satirical article about NHL teams in any way construed as "holier than thou," or "drinking the kool-aid"?

I have said this now three or four times, and will say it again, just so you manage to finally get it: I don't have a problem with criticism of the Calgary Flames. I also do not have any problems with roasts or sarcasm directed at the Calgary Flames. This article is not funny, it is not especially clever, and significant portions of it are unbalanced and obviously poorly researched and not well thought out. I don't particularly enjoy ANY writing that succumbs to such low-brow and lazy construction. The fact that I do not like this article does not make me—nor anyone else who might be critical of its content—a homer, or especially biased in any way.

I'm done with this.

Wait. Let me get this straight. You're saying Deadspin doesn't live up to your journalistic standards?