[Textcritic]

Originally Posted by mrdonkey

I would love to know the reasoning for keeping all of Lazar, Hathaway, and Peluso up ahead of Dube, who has easily and measurably played his way onto the team ahead of all three. It's not even the old "no sense keeping him in the press box" because there's a regular forward spot sitting right there for him.

I want to see the best 12 players start against Vancouver, and there is no argument to be made that a roster that includes any of those three bums is the best lineup possible. It sends a bad message.

Has this happened?