Quote:
Originally Posted by Toonage
Wouldn't shock me if Treliving was burning up the phones trying to move Stone for whatever he can get. Solves a lot of problems.
|
Why would we just dump defensive depth, regardless of contract, just to solve the problem of having defensive depth?
No point doing that unless you think the return makes us better now or you have the next move ready in the chamber to use that freed up cap space to make us better now. Not saying that’s not a possibility but I don’t think BT and the Flames view the potential bottom pairing log jam issue the same way some fans do. They likely view it as a positive and have less anxiety around not knowing exactly what the final pairing will be and are less anxious to ensure the final pairing is seen as cost effective for game #1