Quote:
Originally Posted by Matata
I'm not really interested in JP or the article, I just think it is super dumb to do the whole "can you believe this guy said something in an informal conversation that wasn't literally true!" routine followed by all the self congratulation over pointing out something obvious.
|
Right, which rings extremely hollow when you didn’t read the article, don’t follow Peterson, and are this unable to look at the situation within the context at all.
I think it’s super dumb to for people to comment that an article seemed like a hit piece on Peterson presented as a great tragedy to appease his detractors when you didn’t even read it, which is the basic foundation of forming an opinion on it, but who am I.