Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
But you don't just get to vote for the party If you're in Beddington, you're forced to vote for a science denier if you want to vote UCP. As one of his constitutes, he represents you, and I don't want someone who believes in hoaxes making political decisions for me. It doesn't have to, necessarily, reflect on the rest of the party, but I do think it does raise the question of how he won the nominee.
At least you're honest, but I certainly care if my MLA is a bigot. I think a lot of people would. I could never knowingly vote for a racist. I guess others have different priorities, which is democracy for you, but I hardly think that not-voting-for-a-bigot is hardly an unreasonable position to take.
|
I'm not quite sure why I'm replying as your mind is already made based on Facebook posts dating back over a decade ago.
Surely you know the basis of our system is having MLAs which stick to the party's plan. 1 individual in this election is not going to be able to destroy science and convince people that climate change is fake. Yes you wont agree with all of his views and actions, but what do you dislike more;
Your interpretation of his views from 11 years ago, or another 4 years of NDP fiscally fist f****** our economy?
I'll take the derpy fiscal conservative of a decade ago 10 times out of 10.