Quote:
Originally Posted by Red Slinger
No, that's not what I'm saying.
First of all, I never suggested a program be "federally run". That was your interpretation.
Secondly, I suggested that perhaps we should look at licensing identified dangerous breeds LIKE we do guns, in addition to mandatory training. Does that mean EXACTLY like guns or SIMILAR to guns. Would you step back from the ledge if I used to term "similar" instead of "like"?
Lastly, in this thread we are having a conversation about dog attacks and what can be done about them. I made a suggestion for further discussion. Don't worry, it hasn't been implemented by the Central Party yet.
Do you have any suggestions about how to deal with dangerous dogs besides "freedom" and something something guberment?
|
Complain about not using the term "federally run".
Quote some jibber jabber about freedom and government.
Well done. Dont blame me for your piss poor ideas.