Quote:
Originally Posted by Ozy_Flame
It's a short-sighted view, IMO. With upgraded facilities, increased tourism, private sector collateral benefit (e.g. retail, restaurants), and a reputation boost (Calgary's Olympics were among the most successful), it's not just a two-week party. But it has to be done right.
You don't put together a multi-million dollar Olympic Bid and get Mary Moran to head it because it's a "two week party". That is just flat-out reactionary NIMBYism.
|
Fine. It’s a party with benefits.
I’m not arguing the infrastructure benefits, which the city desperately needs. And of course that’s the key benefit to hosting the party. Where I’m undecided is whether or not this is the best way to accomplish that. I’m pretty much right on the fence for this whole thing. I also see nothing NIMBY about my comment.