Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Well then. This is a radical statement that no one else in this thread has made so far. You've actually openly supported the suppression of true, but politically inconvenient, research results. Your political cause is not so just and so right that it trumps free inquiry. This is essentially the argument of the religious zealot, attempting to dictate to science what it can and cannot investigate for fear that it will tread on cherished beliefs. You do not get to suppress scientific data because the data can be misused by your political opponents. It's really unfortunate that you and others think this is justifiable.
... Screw it, this is, as usual, pointless and totally depressing.
|
Your projecting, I stated what I see as obvious. It has neither my approval or disapproval. There has also been a distinct change in your posts lately, your being rather catty.
What I do think is that it is unsurprising that this occurs as it is byproduct of how university has monetized.