View Single Post
Old 09-10-2018, 05:15 PM   #191
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Duruss View Post
No it is no the same and your premises shows your bias. We live in a politically conscious time. Universities do and need to stay aware of the possible political fallout of there research. Because if they don't it can be weaponized, which is why the alt-right loves Peterson; the can co-opt it and legitimize themselves further.
Well then. This is a radical statement that no one else in this thread has made so far. You've actually openly supported the suppression of true, but politically inconvenient, research results. Your political cause is not so just and so right that it trumps free inquiry. This is essentially the argument of the religious zealot, attempting to dictate to science what it can and cannot investigate for fear that it will tread on cherished beliefs. You do not get to suppress scientific data because the data can be misused by your political opponents. It's really unfortunate that you and others think this is justifiable.

... Screw it, this is, as usual, pointless and totally depressing. Cliff, best of luck here. I do hope someone takes the time to watch - or at least start watching and see if they want to keep going - that Dreger talk up there.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno

Last edited by CorsiHockeyLeague; 09-10-2018 at 05:17 PM.
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote