View Single Post
Old 09-10-2018, 11:02 AM   #79
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VilleN View Post
I am pretty confused by this move from Vegas’ standpoint:
- acquire lots of picks at expansion to set up franchise for long term success.
- team vastly outperforms expectations, trade for Tatar to bolster team heading into playoffs. Mortgages the future a bit, but somewhat understandable if they didn’t massively overpay.
- Make it to SCF in first season, still have assets in place for long term success. Perfect position to be in.
- Trade away more futures to replace Neal. Team is better for the short term. Future is in question.

Just seems like poor management, but what do I know.
I think this was an expensive trade for VGK, and like it a fair bit better for Montreal. But this idea that the Knights have somehow jeopardized their future is preposterous. Even after this deal they still have seven draft picks in the first two rounds of the next two entry drafts, and twelve in the first three between 2019–21. They are in REALLY good shape moving forward.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote