View Single Post
Old 09-04-2018, 05:53 PM   #96
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by username View Post
If I have to sacrifice 4 days a decade (0.01%) of my time to increase the safely of our neighbourhoods thus saving lives then I will.

Hardly seems like this should even be debated....
Calgarians will lose about 700 years of life per year as a result of this change so you need to save about 10 lives. The average Of deaths per year is 9 and since at most this affects 50% of the deaths and you only improve survival rate by half this in the best case scenario will save 1 to 2 lives per year at the expense of 10.

So from a utilitarian standpoint this law doesn’t pay

The logic of its only x is a poor way to make decisions because by that logic highway speeds should be 50 or 80. People die because we drive speed limits can’t be set with a goal of zero

Last edited by GGG; 09-04-2018 at 05:56 PM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GGG For This Useful Post: