Quote:
Originally Posted by McG
I mostly agree with you but I wanted to just draw attention to a challenge of proving this sort of thing.
A lack of evidence is the foundation of innocence; presumption of innocence etc. As an example, I have a lack of evidence that literally, you personally, didn’t send the note. Should I assume you are guilty?
Maybe we should discuss Scottish law’s “not proven”.
|
Not guilty vs not proven. Really should be not proven. Semantics but its a truer definition.