Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt
The Raiders improve while the Bears get worse in the long and short term? That pick won't be top 10, and the Bears should be a wildcard discussion now. You may get into the middle of the first round but again, 99% of the time you won't find a Khalil Mack there.
|
They wont find a khalil mack there
But a first, plus 20m in cap space to improve multiple positions can make the team better as a whole
I didnt say bears worse in the short term, definitely better this year, but to what level was my point
I think they are the 4th best team in thst division, could see them winning anywhere from 5 to 8 games most likely, long term again it depends on the cap and how much space they have and can utilize it
Its the same thing people are saying about the rams today, there are stories on espn and the ringer about their 2 year window starting now after signing donald. The bears are a year behind them with trubisky a year after goff, but there is a reason people question how much defensive playere can make on a cap team, and if you can have enough talent to build a team while paying at least 25% of the cap to two guys
So if the rams have a 2 year window, the bears is 3, i dont think the bears are close to the rams at this point
Which is all i was saying as to why it may not work out for them
Also you saying the bears should be in the wild card discussion
Vegas doesnt agree
Their over under in wins is 6.5, thats tied for 2nd worse in the nfc with the bucs, only arizona is lower