Quote:
Originally Posted by DropIt
What a coincidence. The Flames all hated the people that are gone!
If the players still in the locker room get bent out of shape that easily then I would say they have a pretty weak locker room leadership group.
|
I think your missing the point, exit meetings are there for players to communicate.
Some people think ignoring a problem, or sweeping it under the rug shows strength (..or even a strong locker room in your case). I would argue that a stronger locker room is one where the players communicate shortcomings openly and everyone contributes towards a common goal. Do you see Tkachuk's comments about the perceived selfishness as weak? I think a lot of posters saw his comments as taking ownership and leadership. Players recognize a problem and communicated that at exit meetings. That is how you solve problems, find solutions.