I think the term best player gets used a lot but ignores jury. Paul wasn’t the best player, he was the biggest bully. But best player in BB is quite subjective. Is it comps? Being the group leader? Being popular?
I think Tyler’s doing a good job of staying friends without betraying people too bad, unlike Paul. I feel like he’s gonna have plausible deniability depending on whether Angela goes to jury angry. I feel like she’d sell him out in an instant and poison the jury for him.
He seems to be the only one who has had a good social game with the other side of the house. As several HGs have mentioned KC and Angela haven’t done a very good job of socializing with Fess, Scottie, Haleigh and Sam.
If you influence other houseguests to evict your “friends” but eventually get caught and the jury hates you, like Paul and like what could potentially happen to Tyler, then you’re not the best player. To be the best you get what you want without getting caught.
Or just own it like Brett. I still think Paul wins if he doesn’t deny being an ####### so hard. And it was weird because he believed it so bad. People always use the finale to give speeches about how they ran the house and won comps but never just admit and apologize for stabbing their friends in the back. Just own that #### and people may forgive you.
|