Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
Making it more "balanced" requires something that is not present: a desire to present the subject honestly. The plaque that was put up was 95% moral grandstanding tied to one viewpoint: the idea that JAM was evil because a few representatives of local First Nations groups said so. There was no effort put in to explain why the statue was put up in the first place.
If that's your idea of "balanced", then you really shouldn't be accusing anyone else of being disingenuous.
|
So...you're just straight up denying proven facts now? What is dishonest or incorrect about it?
I don't see the word evil on the plaque...what's your specific complaint?