08-13-2018, 08:22 AM
|
#868
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ken0042
What is funny to me about this- the idea of casting somebody else as Kirk other than Shatner was to show that Kirk's character was larger than Shatner. Now we are talking about not being able to replace him.
I do get Pine's position- the last movie brought in 1/3 of a billion dollars still. It wasn't like it lost money.
|
Quote:
Star Trek Beyond opened to $59.2M, the lowest for the millennial reboot despite having similar reviews to Into Darkness (84% certified fresh). Star Trek Beyond ended its domestic run at $159M — far from enough for a film that cost a reported $185M before P&A and churned a $50.5M loss after all ancillaries counted per financial sources.
|
https://deadline.com/2017/07/war-for...ue-1202123662/
|
|
|