Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic
I think the study as it stands is flawed as a means to draw conclusions about infant trauma as a result of circumcision. I am not necessarily challenging its validity as I am challenging the way it has been promoted in this thread as proof positive of a highly conjectural claim.
I am also interested in acquiring more information, and if this study leads to that then I am all for it. But as of now I think a responsible position to hold on this issue is that it is far from settled, and I would prefer to continue to wait before drawing a definitive conclusion about the benefits vs. detriments of infant circumcision.
|
I can agree with that. Mostly I was just nitpicking on the alarm of the trauma inducing mri compared with the non alarm of the trauma induced by the circumcision itself. Seemed a bit nonsensical to be concerned about one but not the other.
Hopefully there are some better studies coming!