View Single Post
Old 08-09-2018, 02:06 PM   #282
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cain View Post
Why are you skeptical? Scientific reasons or personal leanings?

If you maintain that this is a difficult issue with no obvious solution, but then scoff at a study that might be trying to shed more light on the risk/benefit analysis I'm not sure where to go. Again, do you have any other ideas specifically?
I think the study as it stands is flawed as a means to draw conclusions about infant trauma as a result of circumcision. I am not necessarily challenging its validity as I am challenging the way it has been promoted in this thread as proof positive of a highly conjectural claim.

Quote:
I agree it is a contentious issue, and in those, I generally prefer more information...which presumably is what this study is aiming to provide.
I am also interested in acquiring more information, and if this study leads to that then I am all for it. But as of now I think a responsible position to hold on this issue is that it is far from settled, and I would prefer to continue to wait before drawing a definitive conclusion about the benefits vs. detriments of infant circumcision.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote