Quote:
Originally Posted by Cain
My goodness man. Nobody is lighting anyone on fire.
Studying a child who is about to have a circumcision as a choice of the parent is just a litttttttttttttle bit different than that. I hope you are able to see that. It is going to happen anyway, so why not take a deeper look to see if it should be happening at all. Mental gymnastics indeed.
|
I think we should be lighting people on fire.
And yes, I am completely able to see the differences, it was simply an exaggerated comparison to say measuring trauma by causing trauma is weird.
What I'm really questioning is what are they taking a "deeper" look into? All the MRI is concluding is that yes, the child is in fact reacting to physical stimuli.
Did we need an MRI to prove that, No.
There is literally no discerning difference between a cut man, and uncut man due to the process of circumcision, aside from the obvious aesthetic, and number of spontaneous blow jobs one will receive in their life as pointed out by firefly.
You'll have people that have no perspective on the matter, some that go extreme in one direction or the other, and others that fall somewhere in between.
To be quite honest, I have no perspective on the matter, I'm cut, my sons cut, I don't know why, and I don't care. Maybe that makes me a monster, but so far, my son has never looked at his dick and threatened to murder me, so only time will tell.
However I do enjoy stirring the pot and seeing fact and logic vs bias.
It's been fun so far.