Quote:
Originally Posted by Cain
Yes, of course there will be more issues, but that is like saying that someone with more fingers is more prone to getting an ingrown nail.
These issues don't necessitate lopping off the entire foreskin nor fingers in the previous example. Nobody is arguing that a medically needed circumcision is a bad thing, just that it shouldn't be the default position.
|
Ok but it's not the default position. It's a choice parents make. I don't think it's even covered under universal health care in Canada. Fewer parents chose to do it every year.
The fact is there are medical benefits to male circumcision. There is no loss of sexual sensation and very little risk or medical complications. Literally the opposite of all that is true with female circumcision.
You can disagree with any of that but arguing that male circumcision is a cruel human rights violation akin to what females go trough is just weird.